01 / 04
Disputes in this area rarely begin in court. They begin in an imprecise clause, in a deadline that moved without a written record, or in a delivery that does not match what was agreed.
Construction contracts and construction defects, sale and purchase with latent defects, termination and breach, and nullity of contractual clauses. In practice almost everything reduces to one question: what was promised, in what detail, and what was delivered.
The contract is the starting point, not the end. Amendments, handover records, correspondence, change orders and technical reports matter. In construction defects, the expert report defines the extent of the damage and the liability of each contractor; without that delimitation the claim becomes diffuse.
Before filing, the cost of the process is weighed against the value in dispute, the evidence available and the solvency of the opposing party. Some cases are won and never collected. Where negotiation is better, it is conducted with the same preparation as a hearing.
Most of this litigation is avoided in the drafting: scope definition, change protocol, guarantees, penalties and a dispute resolution mechanism. A well written clause costs less than a process.
Construction defects that appear after handover, delays attributable to the contractor, works performed without a written change order, and unpaid payment certificates. Each requires different evidence: expert technical evidence in the first, the programme and site log in the second, correspondence and change orders in the third, and the contract with account statements in the fourth.
It depends on whether acceptance was recorded with or without observations, on the type of defect and on when it appeared. A record signed without reservations complicates the claim but does not extinguish it on its own. The answer is established by reading the contract and the construction file.
Not always. The analysis compares fees, time and available evidence against what can reasonably be recovered. If the process consumes the value in dispute, that is said before starting.
The contractual relationship defines the front of liability, but the technical allocation of who performed each part of the work is what decides the case. That is why the expert report is commissioned early.
The initial assessment establishes what is at stake, what it will cost and what the real prospect is.
Other practice areas