04 / 04
Three ways of resolving an obligation: enforcing it, securing it or renegotiating it. In all three the question is the same: how much is actually recovered, and how soon.
Monetary and mortgage collection, trusts and transactions or extrajudicial settlements. These are three ways of handling the same obligation, and they should be chosen with the same information used to choose a litigation route.
The enforceable instrument, the debtor solvency, the existence of locatable assets and the cost of interim measures are all reviewed. A monetary claim filed the wrong way obtains a judgment that cannot be enforced. Recovery is compared with litigation before filing.
A security trust allows an obligation to be secured and enforced outside ordinary collection proceedings. Its value lies in the drafting: the description of the assets, the triggering events and the realisation procedure decide whether the security works on the day it is needed.
A well drafted agreement closes the dispute; a badly drafted one reopens it. The final discharge must state precisely what is extinguished, who waives what and how payment is made. There it is decided whether the settlement is final or merely a pause.
If the debtor has no locatable assets, the process produces a judgment that cannot be enforced and a cost the client bears in full. Solvency, existing security and the cost of measures are reviewed before filing. When the expected recovery does not cover the cost, that is said, and alternatives are explored: negotiation, additional security or sale of the position.
It depends on the instrument, the debtor solvency and whether locatable assets exist. Monetary proceedings are quick to obtain a judgment, but actual recovery is decided at the enforcement stage.
It allows the security to be enforced through an agreed procedure, without depending on a declaratory process. The advantage is lost if the deed describes neither the assets nor the triggering events properly.
It closes what it expressly covers. If the document leaves out obligations, periods or persons, the dispute can return. That is why the scope is negotiated with as much care as the figure.
The initial assessment establishes what is at stake, what it will cost and what the real prospect is.
Other practice areas